Go to Home Page
Search the site:


Home
Welcome
About Us
Conference Highlights
Events
News
Newsletter
Activities
Publications
The Holy Land
10th Conference
Projects & Programs
Support HCEF
Light a candle for peace
Links
Contact Us
Site Map
Site Search


A Christmas Message of Peace from Washington to Bethlehem, December 13, 2008

Shrine of St. Jude Living Stones Pilgrimage, April 27 – May 11, 2009

HCEF Pilgrimage to the Holy Land, May 3 - 16, 2009

News

Main News >

A new treaty for the Holy Land?

27-Mar-07
AsiaNews.it
Printer Friendly Format.

Latest Articles
  •  
  • Pope may visit Holy Land in Spring of 2009
  •  
  • Bethlehem visitor numbers soar in 2008 says Israel
  •  
  • Gaza Christians Going Without Mass Border Authorities Deny Entrance to Nuncio
  •  
  • HCEF Establishes First HCSN Committee in Mississippi
  •  
  • Praying at the Wall

    News Sections
    Press Releases
    Media
    News

    The 12 February issue of the influential weekly America, published by US Jesuits, carries an article (its cover article) titled "A New Treaty for the Holy Land?", written by Arieh Cohen, a frequent contributor to AsiaNews from Tel Aviv.

    The article calls for consideration of the possibility of achieving legal security for the Church in the Holy Land through a multilateral treaty that would include a mechanism for "monitoring and enforcement," and which would apply to both Jerusalem and the two national States, Israel and the future Palestinian State.

    The need to consider this, the article says, arises from the observation that, while the "question of Jerusalem" remains unresolved, the pioneering attempts to secure the freedoms and rights of the Church in the two national States through bilateral Agreements have not yet given practical results. The Palestinian State is not yet in existence, and the Holy See's 1993 Fundamental Agreement with Israel has not yet been written into that State's laws, making it in practice unenforceable in Israel.

    But a proposal for a multilateral treaty for Jerusalem does exist, and was discussed in the late 1990's by diplomats of several countries, and it could be enlarged to cover religious freedom and respect for the Church's historic rights in the two national States as well. This does not mean that the ongoing efforts to perfect the bilateral Agreements should or could be given up, the writer observes, but that it might be useful to study a multilateral alternative.